Maybe they’re not too sure themselves
Yesterday (6 Oct), the mainstream media (MSM) has made public the outbreak of the hepatitis C virus in the Singapore General Hospital (SGH).
In an article published yesterday (6 Oct), The Straits Times said that there are 22 cases of infected patients and 4 deaths.
In a separate article that ran today, The Straits Times seems to be downplaying the situation, and said that the hepatitis C virus “infected at least 21 kidney patients at Singapore General Hospital”.
This morning, former Associate Editor of The Straits Times (ST) Bertha Henson called out her former employers, saying that she “seriously dislike(s) the ST page 1 story”.
I seriously dislike the ST page 1 story. It's written in such a way as to put SGH in the best light possible like how…
Just what are the differences in reports? MustShareNews takes a look.
We scrutinise ST’s articles from yesterday and today for discrepancies in the reporting of the incident.
Yesterday: 22 patients were reportedly infected with the virus.
Today: “At least 21 kidney patients” have been infected.
Why the ambiguity? Was the 1 remaining infected patient not a kidney patient?
What even is a kidney patient?
Yesterday: Informative stub telling readers what hep C is. Information found at bottom of article.
Today: One liner found at the start of the article, describing the hep C virus as “a virus that does not spread easily” and “dies quickly”. This information seemingly makes light of the situation and suggests that the hep C virus is nothing major. Although the virus does indeed die quickly when exposed to air, the severity of the virus when patients are infected was not brought up in the later article.
What hep C actually is: According to World Health Organization (WHO), the hep C virus can cause “both acute and chronic hepatitis infection” that ranges in severity from “a mild illness lasting a few weeks to a serious, lifelong illness”.
Those who are “chronically infected” will also “develop liver cirrhosis or liver cancer”.
Just as Bertha Henson has pointed out…
Yesterday: Health Minister Gan Kim Yong was quoted as “gravely concerned” and “disappointed with the occurrence of the cluster of hepatitis C cases in SGH”.
Today: Gan Kim Yong was quoted as “deeply concerned” by the infection at SGH, and the part where he said he was disappointed was not mentioned.
So what is it?
Clearly, someone forgot to…
And KJ’s probably thinking:
So here’s the moral of the story, Singapore: carefully examine how different news outlets present facts, and decide for yourself.
Yes, that includes our site, of course. 😉
Like this post and MustShareNews’ Facebook page to keep up with our posts!
Talk to us! Send in your story suggestions or comments to [email protected]