fbpx

5 Government Agencies Who Wasted Our Money

0

Not your money, still anyhow use?

A Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report submitted on 4 February has drawn attention to “irregularities” in the usage of public funds. The report is in response to a July 2014 Auditor-General’s report. Yup, public funds as in the taxes that we all have to pay.


nooooSource

PAC hinted that government agencies were not using our hard-earned money wisely, as they called for “greater diligence in managing public resources” so as to “optimise their use and minimise wastage”.

So, who were the incriminating government agencies that were caught red-handed?

1. MINDEF

mindef
Source

What happened: 

MINDEF rented 109 hectares of land from PUB in 1971. Then in 1995, MINDEF sublet part of the land to a government-owned contractor who provided services to MINDEF for $45 a year.

What went wrong:

MINDEF used more land than stated in the initial agreement with PUB, but the license was not updated accordingly.

What went wrong (layman version):

MINDEF was lazy to do their proper paperwork. It’s equivalent to us at a library: the latest 50 Shades of ____ book caught our eye and we didn’t want to be recorded borrowing such a sleazy book. So, we just take the book and leave. No paperwork nor procedure followed.


paperworkSource

2. AVA

ava
Source

What happened:

The AVA-managed site at Sembawang was 143,967 square metres large in 2000. The lease was renewed in 2012 for $1.15 million a year in rental, along with a spending of $417,300 to maintain the place.

Another site at Lim Chu Kang was 46,230 square metres large. The 30-year lease, beginning 2000, cost $15.89 million in total. AVA also constructed two special buildings at a cost of $41.71 million.

What went wrong:

For the Sembawang site, 18 out of 41 buildings were vacant or partially occupied. There was also termites and discarded furniture present.

For the LCK site, some spaces were left vacant for more than 10 years. An auditorium was also used only 29 days out of a 365-day year.

What went wrong (layman version):

AVA has a hoarder mentality. What it needs, it has. What it doesn’t need, also must keep. AVA is like us at the annual spring-cleaning ceremony; we absolutely refuse to throw away that ancient colouring book from our primary school days even though we don’t even use it anymore.


Source

3. CPF Board


cpf building 2Source

What happened:

1. The CPF board underpaid $816,000 in CPF contributions over a period of 10 years.

2. There were over-claims and under-claims for Medisave.

3. Incomplete data also resulted in certain groups of people failing to qualify for the Workfare Income Supplement Scheme (WIS).

What went wrong:

1. The checks and balances system that the CPF board had was insufficient.

2. The CPF board did not properly follow up on the claims made by medical institutions, e.g. hospitals.

3. Other government agencies had provided the CPF board with incomplete information.

What went wrong (layman version):

1. They were lazy to conduct independent checks, and merely relied on wage records provided. They are like us at a kopitiam trusting the old auntie who says the cup of kopi-o is $2 rather than checking the price ourselves on the board.

2. They were lazy. Again.

3. “If I kena trouble, I will drag you down with me.” = “But cher! He was also talking, why he never get punished?”


you jump i jumpSource

4. Health Sciences Authority (HSA)


hsaSource

What happened: 

26.1% of import applications checked contained errors, or did not have the proper license. This led to the import of medicinal products whose licenses had already expired.

What went wrong:

HSA said that their trade declaration system was “not meant to serve as a regulatory control tool”. Individual HSA officers could check only certain applications based on experience.

What went wrong (layman version):

The checks were lax. The trade declaration system is apparently put there for show only. Just because Xiao Ming always scores 100/100 for his Math test, the teachers decided not to ever mark his scripts again because they think it is pointless.


for funSource

5. National Parks Board


Source

What happened:

16 letters were confirmed to have been backdated from NPB to suppliers for the Gardens by the Bay project, in order to satisfy AGO’s audit checks. The suppliers also were made to backdate letters back to NPB by the same officer.

What went wrong: 

The incriminating officer told MND, NParks’ supervising ministry, that he backdated letters to fill in missing gaps of documentation so that the records would be complete.

What went wrong (layman version):

临时抱佛脚。Or simply, only when the examinations are coming did NParks then start to do their proper homework diligently.

Alamak, why like that?

No one is perfect, and it seems government agencies are not an exception either.


only humanSource

The full audit report can be accessed via the AGO’s website.


Featured Image via The Real Singapore and Newnation
With reference to TODAY, Attorney-General’s Office

Comments

comments

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.