Banks and telcos in Singapore may soon have to reimburse scam victims if they are found to have been negligent.
This was mentioned in the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA)’s new proposed framework released on Wednesday (25 Oct).
It aims to strengthen the direct accountability of these institutions to consumers.
As such, it lays out the duties of these entities to mitigate the risk consumers face against phishing scams.
Under the proposed framework, payouts to scam victims may be mandatory if financial institutions and telcos breach these duties.
On Wednesday (25 Oct), the MAS and IMDA shared that they have proposed a new Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF) for phishing scams.
Source: Getty Images via CNBC
It sets out the duties of financial institutions, such as banks, and telcos to mitigate the risk consumers face against such scams.
Additionally, it will make payouts to scam victims mandatory should these entities breach their duties.
The SRF will focus on a defined scope of phishing scams, said MAS.
Specifically, it targets cases where scammers deceive consumers into revealing their account credentials while impersonating legitimate entities, leading to unauthorised transactions.
However, it will not cover malware scams.
This places the onus not only on the banks but on the telcos as well, considering that the latter plays a role in facilitating scam SMSes.
In 2022, the Payments Council originally proposed for financial institutions to share most of the losses from phishing scams.
Source: Unsplash
This new SRF covers banks — the custodians of consumers’ money — and telcos, who play a supporting role as the communication channel providers for financial institutions.
The inclusion of telcos is due to the prevalence of digitally enabled scams resulting in unauthorised transactions.
The SRF aims to strengthen the direct accountability of financial institutions and telcos to consumers, MAS added.
“It sets out discrete and well-defined duties for financial institutions and telcos to mitigate the risk of consumers falling prey to phishing scams.”
These duties will include:
Breaches of these duties would hence be the starting point for determining who is responsible for losses under the framework.
Therefore, it incentivises banks and telcos to uphold the desired standards of anti-scam controls strictly.
Also Read: Elderly Man Targeted By Love Scam Attempts To Transfer S$3K, POSB Staff Calls Police
Have news you must share? Get in touch with us via email at news@mustsharenews.com.
Featured image adapted from MakeUseOf, for illustration purposes only.
The coroner said this was the first case of its kind he had encountered in…
The brand-new jet suffered a series of technical issues since its first-ever flight on 19…
The Paradise Tree Snake may have misjudged its landing and ended up on the car.
The 69-year-old was reportedly upset over his neighbour's refusal to apologise.
False claims include that GCB transactions occur without government checks on beneficial owners' identities.
The suspect casually watched as the woman became consumed by flames.