A new bill that will allow the police more power to conduct a search without a warrant has been proposed by the Singapore government.
The bill aims to protect the public by enhancing the police’s ability to tackle crime.
Additionally, the amendments will set out a clear framework for the police to conduct forensic medical examinations (FMEs) for evidence.
According to a press release, the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) introduced the Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2024 for First Reading in today’s (10 Jan) Parliament session.
Source: Singapore Parliament
The bill seeks to amend the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), Singapore’s key criminal justice legislation.
One of the bill’s main features is to protect the public by “strengthening our levers to tackle crime”, MinLaw stated.
This includes a proposed enhancement to the powers of the police and other law enforcement agencies (LEA).
Currently, police may carry out a search without a warrant if they have reason to believe that a person will not produce relevant evidence when ordered to.
However, MinLaw claimed that accurately determining a person’s compliance at the outset is “not straightforward”. Thus, suspects can delay searches and tamper with evidence.
If the amendments are passed, police will be able to search without a warrant when they have “reason to believe” a suspect of an arrestable offence possesses “relevant evidence”.
On top of that, police will also be able to search suspects at the point of arrest. This way, they can remove any dangerous items from them.
The amendments also aim to expand the powers of LEAs such as the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) so that they may “deal with matters arising from predicate offences under their purview”.
“This allows the LEA that is most familiar with the details of the case to conduct the necessary arrests or investigations,” MinLaw explained.
Other than enhancing LEAs’ powers, the bill also proposes a clear legislative framework on FMEs.
These are examinations conducted to obtain forensic evidence, which MinLaw alleged to be “critical for investigations”.
Source: CDC on Unsplash, for illustration purposes only
They highlighted an example in 2016, where a suspect assaulted and raped a woman after breaking into her home.
Police arrested him and conducted an FME, finding the victim’s DNA profile on the accused’s genitals.
This forensic evidence contributed to bringing him to justice.
Given the importance and time-sensitive nature of such forensic evidence, the bill proposes giving police the power to require suspects to undergo FMEs.
The offence must have been “reasonably suspected to have been committed”.
If an accused person refuses to undergo an FME without reasonable excuse, they can be charged with an offence.
The suspect can then face a punishment of up to seven years’ jail, a fine, or both. This is the same as the penalty for obstruction of justice.
Source: ronstik from Getty Images on Canva, for illustration purposes only
Furthermore, the court can also draw negative inferences from such refusals during trials.
MinLaw stated that there would be “safeguards” to ensure that FMEs are done “appropriately”.
These safeguards include only allowing qualified medical professionals to conduct physical medical examinations and invasive medical procedures.
Additionally, only female officers or specialists can take photographs of a female subject’s intimate areas, among others.
The proposed legislative framework also covers FMEs on alleged victims.
Informed consent will generally be required, except in exceptional cases where “informed consent cannot be obtained within a reasonable time”.
Such cases include ones where the alleged victim is in a comatose state.
Those interested can find more information in the MinLaw annex.
Also read: Man Who Sexually Assaulted 6-Year-Old Girl At HDB Staircase Caught 8 Years Later, Jailed 10.5 Years
Have news you must share? Get in touch with us via email at news@mustsharenews.com.
Featured image adapted from Singapore Parliament and by MS News, for illustration purposes only.
Passengers were seen screaming and flying off their seats as the plane dropped 8,300 feet.
Both parties, aged 70 and 60, are assisting with police investigations for intentional harassment.
The fire involved the engine compartment, SCDF said.
Localised flash floods typically subside within an hour, PUB said.
The police do not currently suspect foul play.
The victim is in critical condition.