Every time someone does something seemingly unreasonable and gets caught on video, the Internet is quick to do some ‘CSI’.
Digital vigilantes try matching the face to a profile and digging up information. When they find a lead, they release it online to shame the alleged culprit. This is called “doxxing”.
A revision to the Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) on Monday (1 Apr), however, means that doxxing may now get the supposed ‘vigilante’ fined or even jailed.
The PHA was enacted in 2014 to protect the public from harassment, stalking, cyber-bullying and other kinds of social malice.
But given the increasing trend of online ‘vigilantism’, it’s not surprising that doxxing has assimilated into the act.
Doxxing includes the publishing of:
Essentially, putting up information which will likely cause distress to another person may land you either a fine of $5,000 or a jail term of up to 12 months.
The PHA applies only to individuals, which means that a company or a social group cannot collectively make appeals under this act.
It’s natural to feel compelled to condemn a person for a nasty or downright unreasonable act.
But sometimes, we get the wrong person. And even if we do get the right person, he or she will end up suffering tremendous distress.
So let’s practise a little restraint and let the law deal with those unreasonable people. If they were captured on video, the authorities should have as good a chance of finding out their identities as we do.
Featured image from Facebook and Facebook.
Earlier this year, three managers in SingPost's international business unit were found to have made…
On the other hand, some said they'd prefer sitting next to a massive dog than…
Some sustained injuries after jumping from windows, while others starved to death.
A record of more than 553,000 travellers crossed both checkpoints on 13 Dec.
There has been no year-end Covid-19 wave, as had been expected.
The beef was imported without a veterinary health certificate and halal certification.