After the latest Parliament debate today (29 Nov), a majority of members in attendance have voted in favour of repealing section 377A.
In total, 93 Members of Parliament (MPs) voted in favour of revoking the decades-old law criminalising gay sex, while only three voted against the repeal.
Additionally, 85 MPs voted in favour of introducing Article 156 into the constitutional amendment which allows the Parliament to define, regulate, protect and promote the institution of marriage.
Law and Home Affairs Minister Shanmugam said that the Parliament’s overall choice protects the current definition from being ruled unconstitutional by the courts.
According to The Straits Times (ST), the debate over repealing Section 377A lasted 10 hours across two days.
While 93 MPs voted in favour of the move, the following leaders were against the repeal:
In Parliament, MP Louis Ng discussed the treatment of individuals with existing records of convictions under Section 377A.
To this, Minister Shanmugam confirmed that there are several cases. However, most involve non-consenting victims, acts against minors, or sexual acts committed in public.
He added that a “small number of individuals” were convicted for consensual, private, homosexual acts between adults between 1988 and 2007.
Mr Shanmugam affirmed that he will have his ministry look into how the records can be rendered spent.
In addition to Section 377A, 85 MPs voted in favour of the introduction of Article 156 to the constitution.
In this regard, WP MPs Sylvia Lim and He Ting Ru abstained. Meanwhile, both Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Non-Constituency MPs voted against the move.
For those who are unfamiliar, Article 156 grants the Parliament power to make laws to define and protect the institution of marriage, among other things.
Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli said in Parliament that social norms will stay as they are.
Have news you must share? Get in touch with us via email at news@mustsharenews.com.
Featured image adapted from MCI Singapore on YouTube.
Both parties, aged 70 and 60, are assisting with police investigations for intentional harassment.
The fire involved the engine compartment, SCDF said.
Localised flash floods typically subside within an hour, PUB said.
The police do not currently suspect foul play.
The victim is in critical condition.
The man reportedly posted a suicide note online earlier that day, implying that he had…