Last month, a video showing a condo resident, who is an Indian national, yelling at a security personnel over a $10 parking fee had gone viral.
While members of the public were outraged by the resident’s ‘entitled’ behaviour, the incident also thrust the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) into the spotlight.
Some netizens criticised the agreement for “opening the floodgates” for Indian nationals to migrate to Singapore and compete with locals for jobs.
On Saturday (23 Nov), The Straits Times published an op-ed written by veteran diplomat Tommy Koh regarding his thoughts on Singapore’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), which includes CECA.
In short, Prof Koh claims that as long as Indian professionals are coming in to fill gaps and not displace locals, CECA is mutually beneficial to both countries.
The full op-ed can be found here. It’s pretty long, but a very informative read. We summarise some of his points pertaining to CECA below.
For some background knowledge, CECA was signed between Singapore and India in 2005. The agreement lowers barriers for trade and movement of people between the 2 countries.
Now, what does Prof Tommy Koh know about such agreements?
Well, he was a key figure of the Singapore delegation that negotiated our FTA with the US. He even chaired 2 World Trade Organisation dispute panels, according to his sign-off in The Straits Times.
So how has CECA benefitted Singapore? Prof Koh listed 3 points:
On the other hand, CECA also allows for intra-company transferees, letting Indian nationals work in Singapore for a specific duration.
However, Prof Koh also addressed some misconception regarding CECA.
Firstly, the agreement does not guarantee Indian nationals with jobs in Singapore.
They are also not accorded preferential treatment over the locals.
Lastly, Indian nationals must also meet the work-pass qualifying criteria before they are allowed to work here.
Over the 14 years since CECA was signed, Prof Koh claims that CECA has brought “many benefits” to both Singapore and India.
Particularly, he pointed out that India has a “talent surplus” while Singapore is running a “talent deficit”.
In ending, Prof Koh said that so long as Indian talents are brought in to “fill the gap”, and not to displace Singaporeans from their jobs, CECA remains mutually beneficial for both countries.
In a time and age when fake news spreads as easily as butter, it’s good to see respected figures like Prof Koh stepping out to share their thoughts on important issues and debunking untruths.
What are your thoughts on Prof Koh’s explanation? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Featured image adapted from YouTube.
The brand-new jet suffered a series of technical issues since its first-ever flight on 19…
The Paradise Tree Snake may have misjudged its landing and ended up on the car.
The 69-year-old was reportedly upset over his neighbour's refusal to apologise.
False claims include that GCB transactions occur without government checks on beneficial owners' identities.
The suspect casually watched as the woman became consumed by flames.
The thief left the wallet and more than RM200 behind, presumably to mislead the 72-year-old…