When looking for food, Muslim Singaporeans often look out for either a halal certification or indication of a stall being Muslim-owned.
For a long time, patrons of Al-Afsana Restaurant in Hougang assumed it was halal because of the name, as well as Quranic verses on display.
But when doubts arose recently, the official clarification from the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) shocked many.
Most Muslim-owned stalls carry distinct signages of Arabic-sounding or Malay names with Quranic verses on display.
In place of a MUIS halal certification, these symbols are usually enough to convince Muslim customers that the food is safe for consumption.
For those who abide by religious rulings especially, it’s a serious matter.
So when popular local blog thehalalfoodblog revealed the underlying truth about Al-Afsana restaurant, many netizens were in shock.
After reading an earlier Facebook post, the writers met with the stall owner to seek clarification.
While the current owner explained that they use halal-certified ingredients, the writers felt that it still didn’t justify other aspects of the eatery.
The current signboard, for instance, claims it sells “Indian Muslim Food” and has a Quranic verse on top.
To the layman, the eatery looks like a regular Indian Muslim restaurant.
Though the owner did admit to thehalalfoodblog that they never claimed to be MUIS halal-certified, the above aspects of the restaurant may have led to customers’ confusion.
Thankfully, MUIS stepped in to clear all queries via halalSG on Twitter on 14 Sep.
Addressing the public’s doubts, halalSG confirmed that Al-Afsana Restaurant at Hougang Ave 8 isn’t halal.
Neither is it in the process of obtaining a halal certification.
As a further precaution, the owner will be changing the restaurant’s name and removing all Quranic verses.
Following the commotion, MUIS advises all Muslims to be more discerning, “as food consumption is a personal responsibility”.
Especially in uncertain situations like these, it’s up to the individual to clarify if they’re unsure.
Let’s hope food sellers will also be more responsible, to avoid such confusion.
Have news you must share? Get in touch with us via email at hello@mustsharenews.com.
Featured image adapted from Facebook.
The thief left the wallet and more than RM200 behind, presumably to mislead the 72-year-old…
Such poor sportsmanship.
Earlier this year, three managers were found to have made manual updates on a customer’s…
On the other hand, some said they'd prefer sitting next to a massive dog than…
Some sustained injuries after jumping from windows, while others starved to death.
A record of more than 553,000 travellers crossed both checkpoints on 13 Dec.