Now that we finally get to socialise in person again, many have been quick to arrange meetings with friends they haven’t met in months.
The maximum 5 in a group rule means it’s hard to get everyone together, but some choose to not let this deter them. It seems like they’ve found ways to bend the rules too, as restaurants have reportedly accommodated to larger groups on many occasions.
The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has identified 10 such establishments in the latest investigation, reported Channel NewsAsia (CNA) today (27 Aug).
Quoting the URA, CNA wrote that several restaurants, particularly in the China Square and Prinsep Street area, had been “repeatedly breaching” safe distancing rules.
Some of the ways they had done so included:
For breaking safe distancing rules, 3 restaurants in Singapore have to suspend dine-ins for 10 days, from 28 Aug to 6 Sep. They are:
According to TODAY, URA also fined Der Biergarten $2,000 for repeat offences.
The Folks Collective and Botan at China Square meanwhile have to suspend all alcohol sales for the same duration.
Another 5 outlets got off with a warning and a fine, namely:
In light of the recent findings, URA has advised restaurants to prevent situations which may encourage customers to break safe distancing rules — no multiple reservations, nor allowing large groups to sit together.
If they spot any customers being uncooperative, they should step in and resolve the issue.
Beyond F&B staff, however, some of the responsibility lies with us as customers to look after everyone’s safety.
Clearly breaking the rules not only affects us, but the businesses as well. Let’s do good during these tough times and ensure that we don’t jeopardise other people’s rice bowls.
Featured image adapted from Google Maps, Google Maps and Google Maps.
The coroner said this was the first case of its kind he had encountered in…
The brand-new jet suffered a series of technical issues since its first-ever flight on 19…
The Paradise Tree Snake may have misjudged its landing and ended up on the car.
The 69-year-old was reportedly upset over his neighbour's refusal to apologise.
False claims include that GCB transactions occur without government checks on beneficial owners' identities.
The suspect casually watched as the woman became consumed by flames.