The authorities take ‘Circuit Breaker’ rules very seriously, as evidenced by the heavy punishments that have been meted out so far to rule breakers.
That’s why a 55-year-old woman, charged on 29 Apr for flouting ‘Circuit Breaker’ rules, would be expected to face a similar stiff punishment for allegedly allowing a customer into her salon and giving him a massage, complete with masturbation services.
However, when she appeared in court on Wednesday (13 May), her guilty plea was rejected by the judge as she could not stop erupting into tears, reported Channel NewsAsia (CNA).
The woman, Jin Yin, was accused of providing massage services to a 67-year-old man at a beauty salon in Blk 34 Upper Cross Street on 10 Apr.
As the ‘Circuit Breaker’ had started on 7 Apr, this was against the rules.
She allegedly charged him $150 for the massage and masturbation, which lasted around 1.5 hours, reported TODAY.
For that, she faces one charge under the Covid-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020, for keeping the premises open.
That means she can be fined up to $10,000, jailed for up to six months, or both.
Additionally, Jin allegedly posted an advertisement for massage services on online classifieds site Locanto, even though she had no such licence, reported The Straits Times.
Thus, she also faces two other charges under the Massage Establishments Act — operating a massage business that’s unlicensed, and advertising it.
For each of these charges, she can be fined up to $10,000, jailed for up to two years, or both.
During her trial in court on Wednesday (13 May), the drama started when Jin heard that she might be fined $21,000 as a result of the charges.
The woman fell to her knees and begged Judge Ong Hian Sun, saying that she did not have enough to pay the fine.
Throughout the trial, she sobbed and cried hysterically, despite the interpreter and several security officers attempting to console her.
Source
The hysterics prompted the judge to stand down the case twice for Jin to calm herself down.
However, she was unable to do so, and kept sobbing.
Eventually, the judge deemed that she was not in the right state of mind to plead guilty, and rejected her plea.
In court, Jin related a tale of woe, saying that she only had $3,000 left after borrowing money to pay for her mother’s cancer treatment. Her mother has since passed away.
She had committed the offences as she needed to earn money to pay off these debts, she had previously said.
She also has a daughter in Beijing to raise, she added.
Jin Yin was also told that she could serve a jail term instead, if she could not pay the fine.
When she asked how long the jail term would be, Judge Ong did not give her an answer — this is because sentencing decisions are usually made after the conviction.
To that, Jin then started crying loudly again, asking, “What about my daughter?”.
She was given a chair so she could sit down.
Judge Ong has adjourned the case to a pre-trial conference for later this month.
While many might be sympathetic to Jin’s troubles, flouting ‘Circuit Breaker’ rules must be taken very seriously, as they have an impact on public health amid the Covid-19 pandemic.
Hopefully, she manages to maintain her composure when she returns to court.
Featured image adapted from Google Maps.
The driver who hit one of the cats purportedly denied doing so behaved angrily.
It has been marketed online as a candy that helps with male sexual enhancement.
"POP MART does not have any official licensed partners in Singapore," it said.
51% of Singapore's average monthly rainfall in November fell in northern Singapore over less than…
He made sure all the passengers were served before taking a slice for himself.
The doctor recommended a 2-week gap between manicures to allow nails to recover.