Latest News

GrabUnlimited User Cancels Subscription Claiming Price Discrimination, Grab Denies Claims 

GrabUnlimited User Cancels Subscription After Price Experiment

Those who use food delivery apps know that it can get pricey, so deals like GrabUnlimited are always welcome.

However, a GrabUnlimited subscriber recently found out that he hadn’t been saving as much as he thought.

In an experiment, the user was apparently charged a higher service fee than someone else with a standard account.

Grab has since reached out to the user, claiming that they do not price discriminate.

GrabUnlimited customer conducts experiment after reading online accounts

The user brought attention to the issue in a Facebook post on Friday (5 May).

In the post, the OP detailed his experiment and the reason behind the test.

Source: Facebook

Before jumping into the details, he provided some context about his GrabUnlimited subscription.

He shared that he subscribed to GrabUnlimited last year after considering the “attractive” perks.

For only S$5.99 a month, he would save S$3 from the total bill every time he ordered food using the app.

Based on Grab’s website, GrabUnlimited subscribers can claim the S$3 GrabFood delivery voucher 99 times a month.


However, a chance read prompted the OP to check if GrabUnlimited subscribers are ‘assigned’ a different delivery fee.

GrabUnlimited user apparently finds price difference

According to the OP, he then used two phones to make a GrabFood order from the same restaurant, at the same time.

It was then that he found out about the slight difference in service fees.

While the GrabUnlimited subscriber incurred an S$8.80 service fee, the standard user was charged S$6.30.

Source: Facebook

Despite ordering different menu items, the subtotal came up to the same amount.

Source: Facebook

Although he noted that he had saved S$0.50 more as a GrabUnlimited subscriber, the OP still felt as though the deal was a “misrepresentation”.

Following the experiment, the OP cancelled his subscription and stated that “the experiment has left a bad taste in their mouths”.

Grab denies price discrimination

Grab subsequently reached out to the OP in the comments section.

Source: Facebook

First and foremost, Grab stated that it does not “price discriminate amongst users”.

It then elaborated that prices are based on live market conditions at the start of each order.

As there may be times when these conditions can “change drastically”, two users may incur different fares for the same order.

Grab then offered to further investigate the issue.

However, users might find Grab’s statements familiar as they largely resemble those issued in response to other customers who made similar discoveries.

Have news you must share? Get in touch with us via email at

Featured image adapted from PYMNTS and Facebook.

Dayana Rizal

Dayana needs coffee, all the time. She takes daily dopamine-breaks in the sun.

Recent Posts

S’pore food delivery rider claims he earned more than S$8.4K in a month, worked over 14 hours/day

He shares his achievements in hopes of inspiring others who struggle financially like he used…

3 Mar 2024, 6:43 pm

Former RI Headmaster & Temasek JC Principal Eugene Wijeysingha dies aged 90

He started his teaching career at RI in 1959.

3 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm

Blackpink’s Lisa attends Shinee concert in S’pore days after being spotted at Changi Airport

Shinee’s concert was on 2 Mar, the same day as Taylor Swift’s first show in…

3 Mar 2024, 4:42 pm

Taylor Swift fans can make friendship bracelets for free at kiosk outside S’pore National Stadium

Be part of the experience even if you don't have tickets.

3 Mar 2024, 3:12 pm

SMRT increases train frequency at Stadium MRT to accommodate crowds leaving Taylor Swift concerts

The measures include keeping faregates open and having staff onsite to guide the commuters.

3 Mar 2024, 2:28 pm

Woman randomly hits passers-by with umbrella in Chinatown, police called to the scene

Passers-by could only turn and stare at the woman in shock as she walked away…

3 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm