Pritam Singh & Chan Chun Sing Lock Horns In Parliament Over Job Distribution Among Locals & Foreign Talents
Turns out Parliament is a lot more entertaining than you would have guessed.
During Monday’s (6 Jan) debate, Worker’s Party chief Pritam Singh launched an arsenal of questions, repeatedly demanding for a specific breakdown of official employment numbers.
Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing wasn’t having any of it. He spent a whopping 30 minutes trying to address those questions, as reported in TODAY Online.
In an incredibly entertaining smackdown, which you can view here, Mr Chan questioned Mr Singh’s motives for pressing the point.
He later stressed the takeaway lesson, which was Singaporeans have jobs – good jobs – and that sowing discord along national lines was only going to weaken prospects for everyone.
Wanted to know official employment numbers under ITMs
It all began when Mr Singh initially tabled a question in Parliament asking for the statistics regarding the number of jobs created under the government’s Industry Transformation Maps (ITMs).
The ITMs are long-term plans aimed at boosting growth and competitiveness. Essentially, they’re kind of the national equivalent of your New Year’s Resolutions.
Except these are real. And they will actually benefit you.
So basically, not like your New Year’s Resolutions at all.
Overall gain in local employment numbers
The House heard that under the ITMs, 39,300 Singaporeans and 8,600 permanent residents (PRs) gained employment. Meanwhile foreign employment decreased by 28,500, reports TODAY Online.
Businesses looking to deliberately exclude qualified Singaporeans would be punished with stiffer penalties, further reinforcing the point that Singaporeans are the focus of the government’s employment policies.
In response, Mr Singh requested further details.
Holland-Bukit Timah MP Liang Eng Hwa also questioned whether the growth had benefited Singaporeans, and in particular if they had benefited Singaporeans more than foreigners.
Mr Chan then stood up to give a half-hour long speech to answer them.
Focus has always been on training Singaporeans to lead
Mr Chan said that finding a balance between locals and foreigners in the workforce is a longstanding challenge for the government.
He stated that foreigners who are currently employed in higher and better-paying positions than Singaporeans are only short-term, economically-motivated arrangements.
Furthermore, he stated that the government was committed to ensuring that Singaporeans benefit from these short-term gains and receive sufficient training so that one day, they can replace their foreign bosses.
Cue old Chinese proverb about suffering now to enjoy the fruits of your labour later.
He also noted that between 2015-2018, nearly 60,000 new jobs were created exclusively for locals. During that time, unemployment rates hovered at a low 3.77%-4.08%, meaning that out of every 25 people you met, only one would be unemployed.
Not one to be easily pacified however, Mr Singh continued pressing for numbers, specifically about the ratio of Professionals, Managers, Executives, and Technicians (PMETs) who were Singaporeans versus those who are PRs.
This is where Mr Chan decided to put his foot down. He said,
I don’t think we have anything to hide. We have just shared the data…We can get you the numbers.
He also went on to saying,
But let me say this: What is the point behind the question? First, has local unemployment increased with all these efforts? The answer is a resounding ‘no’.
Mr Chan stated that local wages are rising faster than other countries, and that Singaporeans are definitely benefiting.
He cautioned against the potential disunity sowed by statements that seemed to pit Singaporeans and PRs against each other.
He gave a reminder that the divide isn’t between Singaporeans, PRs, or even the foreign workforce.
Instead, we are all on Team Singapore. Everyone has a part to play in reducing unemployment, and giving Singaporeans the best chance possible on the global stage.
Division is not the answer
With the elections coming, foreign employment is shaping up to be a hot-button issue yet again, especially with certain unsavoury incidents still fresh in our collective memories.
We would do well to remember not to resort to divisive rhetoric.
It still comes down to us to work hard to make use of the government’s measures. All the jobs in the world won’t matter if we’re unwilling to take them. Blaming others isn’t going to make us look any better either.
Still, it was entertaining to see two heavyweight politicians spar about an issue close to Singaporean’s hearts, and it’s encouraging that they’re taking it as seriously as us. We think they did well to keep things cool too.
All things considered, it could have gone worse.
Featured image adapted from Channel NewsAsia (CNA).