Tan Cheng Bock Calls For Independent Review, Says Root Causes Must Be Found
By now, you’ve probably heard about former domestic helper Parti Liyani’s acquittal of stealing charges, and the uproar over the “improper motive” of her former employer’s family as stated in the judgement.
Her former employer, Mr Liew Mun Leong, has stepped down from his public service roles including Changi Airport Group chairman.
However, Progress Singapore Party chief Tan Cheng Bock doesn’t think the buck should stop at Mr Liew.
The whole system needs to be looked at, and it should be done via an independent review, he said.
A witchhunt isn’t the way, must find root causes: Dr Tan
Dr Tan seems to agree with Home and Law Minister K. Shanmugam in saying a witchhunt isn’t the way to handle this matter.
Blaming or removing 1 person isn’t enough, he said.
That’s because if we want there to be proper accountability for this case, he thinks we must seek out the root causes, not just individual human errors, adding,
We must examine if there are underlying systemic faults — whether there are any failures in safety processes, protocols, checks and balances. If not, we risk repeating the same mistakes again.
In fact, he suggests that we take “a long hard look at ourselves” to determine and correct the lapses that resulted in an innocent woman being put through a 4-year court case.
Dr Tan lists out lapses in every layer of criminal justice system
Specifically, he lists out several lapses on the part of the authorities, which combined to produce “a perfect storm”.
These lapses occurred in every single layer of our criminal justice system, he said — from the police, to the prosecution and then the criminal District Court.
According to Dr Tan, questions that must be asked include:
- Why did the Investigating Officer attend to the case only the day after Ms Parti returned to Singapore?
- Why did the police leave evidence with the Liew family for 1.5 years?
- Why did the police take custody of the evidence only on 18 Apr 2018? That was 6 days before the trial stated on 23 April 2018.
- Since the police only took custody of the evidence 6 days before trial, did the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) have enough time to assess its quality before deciding to hold a trial?
- Did the relevant police officers, prosecutors and district judge have enough supervision, training and resources to discharge their tasks competently?
- Was the case assigned to the right personnel with the correct skills and experience to do the job?
- What will the relevant agencies do to ensure these mistakes are not repeated?
Dr Tan questions whether govt agencies should ‘ownself check ownself’
But in this case, Dr Tan feels that “ownself check ownself” isn’t a good method.
Though Mr Shanmugam has acknowledged that there were lapses, and assured Singaporeans that the case will be thoroughly reviewed by the authorities, Dr Tan says the review shouldn’t be “conducted in isolation or silos”.
He pointed out that the AGC and Ministry of Home Affairs are basically reviewing themselves.
In that case, asked Dr Tan,
Are they independent enough to be 100% objective?
That’s why he thinks an Independent Review Body should be created instead. In this way, the panel can “critically and holistically” access the government agencies to see what went wrong, and make recommendations to avoid the same mistake happening again.
Uncomfortable questions must be answered
Above all, Dr Tan thinks that the questions he asked may be uncomfortable, but necessary.
They have to be answered to ensure Singaporeans that our criminal justice system is efficient and fair to all, he added.
Do you think Dr Tan’s urging for an independent review is the right call? Please share your views in the comments.